[ ver- jin-y uh-plan ] show ipa. | More authority over the states and new authority over the people. What are the 3 branches of government in the Virginia Plan? While state representation was their most glaring difference, it came down to the fact that the Virginia Plan had no intention of fixing the Articles of Confederation itself, whereas the New Jersey Plan did. The New Jersey Plan called for only one legislative house with equal representation by all states. How well do you know T.L.O versus New Jersey? [4][15] The Connecticut Compromise, introduced by Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, suggested a bicameral legislature with the House of Representatives apportioned by population, as desired by the Virginia Plan, and the Senate apportioned equally by state, as desired by the New Jersey Plan. Resting at the heart of the debate over the Virginia and New Jersey plans was: A disagreement over the national government being representative of the people or of the states. The national legislature could decide on a national executive with the authority to execute all national and executive laws, including the power to start wars or create treaties. Because of this glaring discrepancy, both plans shared almost no similarities. [5] A significant debate arose on proportional representation following the introduction of the Virginia Plan. The difference between the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan is the former proposed equal state representation in Congress and the latter proposed state representation be determined by population. |