Identify and Investigate Target Market Channels

Do you know your target market? When asked that question most trainers, consultants, and professional coaches can paint a fairly clear picture of what a target client looks like. When asked how they market to that target audience a list of marketing channels or media follows. But is the target market using those channels or media?

The ease in which digital marketing campaigns can be started has created some laziness in investigating which channels are most appropriate for a particular demographic. The thinking is that it’s so easy to set up the channel, we might as well give it a try and see if there are any results.

However, appropriately using a marketing channel typically has a significant investment in time and resources. Getting started might be simple but maintaining the presence in an effective way over the long term is likely not a small investment. Even more damaging is when a focus is placed on “positive” metrics that aren’t drawing the right audience. Some trainers, consultants, and professional coaches personally like using a particular channel and justify its use through irrelevant metrics that have no tangible impact on generating sales or leads.

The flip side of the problem is disregarding a channel because your prospects “don’t use it.” Often times a marketing channel is derided because a trainer, consultant, or professional coach doesn’t personally like or understand that channel. Just because it’s something that you don’t prefer, doesn’t mean that people in your target market don’t like or use it either.

Two clients recently showed the polar opposite in regards to a Facebook campaign.

The first client said, “I tried Facebook for a while. In fact, we did the whole social media thing. We got nothing out of it so I don’t want to waste time with it.” In reviewing what had been done we found a couple months of posts with no focus on building a following. When we pointed out that the Facebook page was never really given time to grow the response was, “That could be but the result was NO Leads. I struggle with the math there. How much effort multiplied by ZERO results in leads?” This outlook was a self-fulfilling prophecy, “Social media doesn’t work so I’ll put only a little effort in. After applying minimal effort there are no results which clearly show social media is not a valid channel for my target audience.”

Another client experienced the opposite outlook. He loved Facebook and crafted several contests to boost his following. After pulling lead data and finding that Facebook was actually the least effective social media channel he responded with, “I’m sure these leads are from Facebook, maybe they are just navigating in an indirect way which is skewing the results.” Upon further analysis we found that only about five percent of his audience was a valid prospect. The other ninety-five percent had liked his page during contests for a free restaurant gift certificate and likely had little or no need for the consultant’s services.

Remember that the best crafted marketing campaign will be a failure if it doesn’t target and reach the right people. Investigate marketing channels and if it appears that your target market is present make a plan to use it. Then be diligent and objective in investigating the data to ensure that the market you identified truly exists.

Gather Client Testimonials

ID-100247368Getting testimonials is not a groundbreaking marketing suggestion. However, many trainers, consultants, and professional coaches don’t consistently generate testimonials from their satisfied customers. Here are several ways to make gathering testimonials part of business as usual.

Use Client Emails

One of our best clients at generating testimonials has at least two every month. How does he consistently generate so many testimonials? Simple, if his client sends him an email thanking him, he’ll cut an excerpt out and ask if it’s OK to use that as a testimonial. The answer from his client is almost always yes because the work of writing the testimonial is already done.

Write Testimonials for clients

If you have a client with particularly good results or a great story to tell as a testimonial, try writing it for them. Then send them the testimonial asking for edits or approval. This has the added benefit of reaffirming that the client perceives as much value as you do in the working relationship.

Video Testimonial Recording

If you have regular consulting or training sessions with a client, ask if they’d be willing to shoot a video of their experience. Make it casual and have some prepared questions to prevent the client from rambling. Record more than you think you’ll need and then spend some time editing the most powerful or well shot sections.

Ask for the Testimonial

It’s simple but many consultant, trainers, or professional coaches simply don’t get testimonials because they don’t ask for them. If you want to make testimonials even simpler set up a form on your website where people can input their response. You can even standardize the form in many cases with checkboxes for common benefits clients receive or rankings of what services have been most beneficial.

 

Make gathering testimonials part of your day-to-day activities and make sure to gather them in a variety of media. Often times people default to the technology or style they are comfortable with and neglect other avenues. If you’ve struggled with producing videos in the past, work out a system to create them, seeing and hearing an actual testimonial is a powerful presentation. Just because you can shoot video doesn’t mean that you always should. Make sure to have written testimonials or transcripts for times when text is required or more appropriate

Testimonials can be a powerful marketing tool especially when done consistently. The same testimonial popping up over and over again can make it seem like a trainer, consultant, or professional coach only has a handful of satisfied clients. Gathering testimonials consistently will truly reflect the wide array of people and companies that you count as satisfied clients.

 

Image courtesy of Stuart Miles / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Reusing Articles For Marketing

Article and content reuse can be a valuable way to save time in producing the quality content that drives productive online marketing. It can also be a crutch that leads to repetition, disinterest, and obsolescence.

It’s rare that I encounter a trainer, consultant, or professional coach that isn’t strapped for time. Any strategy for decreasing the time commitment to sustain marketing efforts is a welcome one. However, in content reuse, what starts as a one-time shortcut often becomes a habit.

In meeting with a trainer recently, I asked if they would need help with content creation. The trainer said, “No I don’t need anything like that. I recycle the same group of articles so we’re set for content.” In asking about the content it worked out that the articles repeated on about a two year cycle. I asked if there was any indication that his audience had lost interest in his articles and he replied, “No one’s ever complained about it. Heck if someone was paying that close attention they’re probably already a client.”

However, in looking over his marketing metrics his audiences engagement was significantly lower than average. While there could be several factors weighing in on that, the fact that he was repeating himself over and over didn’t seem like a motivating factor for people to remain engaged.

If you find you chronically reuse content then you are likely suffering in three primary ways:

  • New articles are not being added to your website so there is not a consistent feed of fresh content to assist in your search engine optimization efforts.
  • Social and email subscribers may not recognize specific articles have been repeated but almost always recognize a similar topic and begin to disengage or ignore the messages.
  • Content online often gets dated quickly and using old articles with current dates can often make you look out of touch. (One of the trainer’s articles referenced cellular phones as a “new” technology)

While some content reuse is often valuable and effective, too much is often a problem. It’s OK to revisit past content from time to time, especially when a time crunch prevents new material from being created. However, be sure to edit it to ensure that the article is still relevant and makes a valid point.

If you find that you are habitually reusing content then it’s time to evaluate your marketing strategy. It’s unlikely anyone will complain about repetitive content, instead they’ll disengage or stop paying attention. Take a good hard look at your metrics, is it providing the complaint that your audience is tired of hearing the same thing over and over?

Be Balanced in Replies to Online Reviews

ID-10079334With tools like Google Reviews and Yelp there is no shortage of communication channels online for people to provide reviews on your product or service. Many trainers, consultants, and professional coaches tend to ignore these comments and review. It’s just not something they monitor as part of their online presence. While that isn’t necessarily damaging, it does ignore an avenue of interacting with your target market and clients. But just replying to reviews doesn’t make it a positive avenue. If you decide to engage in these reviews and comments, what you respond to is often as important as how you respond.

I was recently looking up a PC repair company who was active with Google Reviews. They had a four and a half star out of five rating and every single positive review contained a response from the company with exactly how they had achieved the results that received a glowing review. It was reassured until I noticed that not one of the negative reviews had received a response.

Even a simple, “Sorry that you were not satisfied. We try to meet all of our customers’ needs and regret not meeting your expectations,” would have made me feel like everyone got an equal amount of attention. I was left with the sense that if I didn’t like what they offered, I could get lost.

The reverse scenario can also be disconcerting. A company that only responds to negative reviews often appears to be defensive and making excuses for shortcomings. Not the impression most firms want to give.

I ended up speaking with the owner of the PC repair company and discovered that impression was false. He was competent and diligent about helping me with a hardware problem I was experiencing. Even when I disagreed with some of his solutions, he was accommodating and worked at providing a positive outcome.

In short, he didn’t ignore problems or my particular requests. Obviously this is not a make or break element to your online marketing, I still hired this company despite my misgivings. It does, however, serve as a warning on how your responses can subtly communicate negative impressions.

By all means address comments and reviews online but make sure not to only comment on negative or positive ones. Cordial and honest responses often provide the balanced response that most trainers, consultants, and professional coaches actually provide.

Image courtesy of David Castillo Dominici / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

In Competition with . . . Yourself

Most trainers, consultants, and professional coaches have plenty of competition but some still insist on adding more . . . themselves. Pay close attention to your calls to action. If you find that your offers are too similar or promoted simultaneously, you’re probably competing against yourself.

We run into this primarily with two particular calls to action.

The first is events. It’s OK to promote events at the same time but there should be a clear differentiator like topic or location. The differentiator should not be subtle. If location is the differentiator then it should be significant, not a ten minute drive from one to the other. If the topic is the differentiator then the presentation should be touching on mostly unrelated topics.

If it’s not readily apparent to your audience, then you risk confusing them or dividing them. If you can’t clearly define the significant differentiator, you’re better served merging the events into a single event and promoting that to both segments.

The second is reports or whitepapers. The only time it’s OK to simultaneously promote different whitepapers or reports is if they are being offered to different segments. The same group of people should not be made an offer for new whitepapers simultaneously. Rather promote the first and get some mileage out of it and then promote the second.

There are only two exceptions to this rule whitepaper/reports recaps where the content has already been made available but a recap is listing all of the items that are available. The second is if one report should follow the second. For instance, if a report references another report it could be promoted as reference material.

If there is any flexibility, avoid promoting similar calls to action at the same time. If the timing of offers requires that more than one offer be promoted at the same time a clear differentiator must be made obvious. Otherwise your audience might skip an offer they would typically be interested in for the competition, your other offer. Worse yet, they might be unsure which offer is best suited for them and skip it all together.

Usability Fanatacism

ID-100177052Too much of a good thing will inevitably corrupt it.  Usability is important but can be taken to an unsustainable extreme.

We ran into an issue recently where an email tested fine across browsers and platforms.  One of the test users printed it and found that there was some odd spacing at the bottom.  So we had other testers print the email with the same settings and the issue could not be duplicated.  The best guess for the error was that there was a printer driver on that computer causing the spacing error.  Our recommendation was to move on because the the email was easily readable despite the spacing issue, it was unlikely that many people would print the email at all, and even if the email was printed only this one particular computer was causing the problem hinting as a platform setting.

However, the communication manager wanted to be certain that everything was “perfect” so she spearheaded a few rounds of revisions to the email layout.  After a week of trial and error the email printed properly on that machine.

While the problem was solved the email was sent a week late.  This particular email was promoting an event which ended up not being well attended.  Did the week delay cause this?  That’s unlikely but an added week of time to see how the promotions were doing and make adjustments to the rest of the campaign might have made a difference.

The point is that it was not a good use of resources to fix such a minor usability problem. The fanatical quest for perfection facilitated a lackluster result.  Seek for superior usability but don’t seek out every possible scenario to test.  The fact is that it’s not humanly possible to test every possible scenario and create something that never encounters a glitch.  Make sure to cover major usability issues like intuitive layout, browser or platform compatibility, and presentation of information.  As long as glitchs are minor or extremely isolated it’s likely not in your best interest to nitpick or tern over every rock seeking a problem.

 

Image courtesy of pakorn / FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Is Your Marketing Problem . . . a Marketing Problem?

Marketing is often a “fun” business topic.  It’s surrounded by new opportunities and getting a company’s name into the market.  Sometimes trainers, consultants, and professional coaches let that zeal taint how they perceive business issues.  Their desire to work on marketing makes all problems look like marketing problems.

In discussing calls to action with a business owner, he told me how much he enjoyed marketing.  As we talked through a few points he interrupted me when I mentioned events, “We’ve tried events and they are just a pain.  People sign up but then don’t show up.”  We briefly discussed some confirmation messages and reminder initiatives to improve attendance for those that signed up.  We continued the conversation and when I mentioned whitepapers and reports he complained, “Those things are a waste of time.  Sure people download them but they aren’t real leads.  We’ve never had anyone interested when our sales team called.” We then discussed transition strategies to the sales team.

Curious I asked, “Sounds like you have a marketing system down pat, what’s your best call to action.”  He smiled and said, “Our radio ads are great.  I do them myself and love hearing them on the radio.” So I asked, “Sounds good, and it generates a lot of leads?”  He responded, “Yes, we get some calls in from it. Not a whole lot but I think the most powerful aspect is people recognize our name when my sales people meet with them.”

I was confused because all of the web marketing calls to action were criticized for not generating solid leads.  However, radio was lauded for providing very few measurable leads.  Nothing against radio, it can be a powerful medium, but it seemed like he liked it because it served as a name recognition crutch for the sales team rather than a marketing tool.

My lesson learned was that the business owner liked talking about marketing.  So much so that other business problems were assigned to marketing. Attendee confirmation and reminders was a problem with his administrative process.  Sure, it used some common tools and competencies with marketing like email reminder content and layout but the actual process was not a core marketing task. In discussing downloads, the business owner claimed to have had over 500 leads from downloads but not one of those people were interested?  While marketing could help the process by offering a promotional deal or call to action after the report was downloaded, there is a strong indication that the sales team might have a deficiency in approach calls to prospects.

Are you working on the right end of the problem?  If marketing is presenting a professional message, building an audience, and generating leads then it’s meeting its primary goals.  Any related problems might be affected or helped by marketing efforts but will not be solved with them.

 

Focus on the Marketing Elements That Convert

ID-100186396I was part of a strategizing meeting for a new online marketing initiative years ago.  The owner of the company who was looking to start the new campaign interrupted the project manager on seeing a sample landing page layout and said “I’m not sure about that shade of blue in the background.”  The blue in question was pulled from their logo but the designer on hand asked what kind of blue the owner had in mind. “Crisper,” the owner said.  A half hour conversation ensued about what type of blue would be “crisper”.

My reason for being at the meeting was to nail down the ideal audience and agree on an email schedule.  At the end of the hour meeting, the designer had a long description of what blue might work but none of the high level topics had been addressed.

I’m not trying to downplay the importance of a professional design, it makes a difference.  But once “professional” looking is achieved, small tweaks will make little or no difference.  Instead it becomes a conversation with no clear purpose or correct answer.

That campaign never launched because none of the critical elements were covered.  Instead small design and branding issues were debated.  So it ended up being a complete waste of time and money.

Most consultants, trainers, and professional coaches don’t have a lot of spare time to dedicate to online marketing.  So when time is set aside to strategize a campaign, make sure to focus on marketing elements that convert. Things like design can often side track critical elements because it’s more fun to talk about personal preferences.  Unless something is glaringly wrong with a layout or design couch it until high level strategy is set. Then make specific changes.

So what are important elements?  A few examples that will critically affect online marketing is:

  • Identifying target audience
  • Calls to Action
  • Communication channels
  • Communication schedule

If any of these items are missing or out of sync, it’s likely to sink the entire campaign.  If you find that you’ve covered all of the critical items, feel free to debate finer details, but never before.

 

Image courtesy of KROMKRATHOG/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net

The Industry Average Myth

There is a lot of “common knowledge” that floats around about what’s good for a particular metric and what’s bad for a particular metric. While these numbers can serve as a guideline they are likely a poor benchmark. Make sure that an industry average actually applies to your industry.

As an example 10% is often used as a good click through rate. But for many industries or campaigns (like trainers, consultants, and professional coaches) it might signify an outstanding rate. It might also be an underperformance in some cases.
The problem with blindly using industry “rates” is that it might set up an unrealistic goal, or worse yet, have you focus on the wrong problem.

We had a potential client that was comparing their click rates to industry average and decided that their rates should be higher. Frustrated he said, “That’s why I’m talking to you guys. My click rate is 5%. I’m just barely making the low average!” The problem with this is that he was looking at “industry average” which was the below:

  • 5% – 15% for B2B newsletters
  • 2% – 12% for B2C promotional email marketing campaigns
  • 10% – 20% for emails sent to highly segmented and personalized B2B and B2C lists
    [Data: Alert Solutions]

While we agreed that he could be doing better, he was not as far outside the norm as he was suggesting. He was taking his overall average which included promotional emails and comparing just to the B2B content newsletter rates. A more accurate reflection would have been taking the B2C and B2B data and averaging that.

To get a better picture we used data from our email marketing platform. The email marketing platform lets us define a particular market segment within B2B, in his case a business consultant. This was data specific to his actual industry and let us compare content based results vs. promotional results. Turns out that he was almost at the median with an average being 4%-8%.
So the question was, “Are you comfortable being middle of the road?” This potential client still wanted improvement to be toward the top of average or even exceed it.

The point is, he didn’t know where he stood because he was using broad generalities. He could have been in the top percentile and still beating himself up trying to fix a problem that didn’t exist. If you’re going to benchmark against averages, make sure it’s the right average.

Time to Promote an Event

Events can be a powerful call to action.  They can also be a source of stress as a marketing tool because it can really put a firm’s reputation on the line.  The embarrassment at having only two people show up for an event is tangible and gives a poor first impression to the limited audience members.  This stress often leads trainers, consultants, and professional coaches to make irrational decisions about timing that set their marketing up for failure.

Last week a client emailed and said, “I have an event coming up next week but it’s not on the site.  Can you set up an event webpage and send out an email invitation?”

The first problem with the request is the obvious one. One week’s advance notice will limit the availability of much of the audience. Typically an event should be set up and promotions started at least 4 weeks in advance (2-3 weeks for webinars).  More complex events will require more lead time than that. A week’s advance notice for any event is unlikely to generate much interest for someone seeing the event for the first time.

When we followed up on the event our client said, “I need to get the invite out because I’ve invited a couple people who are coming, but that’s it.  I need to fill the room.”  When we asked how long the event had been scheduled for our client said, “I put it on my calendar a month ago but I have an event this week and a second one next week which we’ve focused our marketing on.  This one just slipped through the cracks.”

This highlights the second problem.  Clumping too many events together tends to cause your own events to compete with one another.  A good rule of thumb is not having an event within a month of another unless they are being marketed to distinctly different groups.

Don’t wait until it’s too late and stress out about an event.  Put an event calendar together by quarter, 6 month, or yearly schedules.  That can serve as a guideline for promotional timing and ensure that you have sufficient time to fill the room.

1 8 9 10 11 12 18